<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/9b069e1a524bb615</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/externalising-migration-control/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Externalising Migration Control - S.S. and Others v Italy Marks A Missed Opportunity for Accountability</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Harb, Malak</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2025-07-02</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Charta der Grundrechte | Europäische Union</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>ECtHR</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Europa</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Europarecht</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Human Rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Human Rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Italy</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Jurisdiction</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Migration</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>SAR</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Charta der Grundrechte | Europäische Union</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Europarecht</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Human Rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Migration</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>On 20th of May 2025, the European Court of Human Rights declared the case of S.S. and others v Italy inadmissible under Art.1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The decision marks a missed opportunity. Instead of addressing the question of functional jurisdiction in the context of externalised migration control, the Court found that Italy does not enjoy extraterritorial jurisdiction over a group of irregular migrants whose ship was wrecked on the high seas near the Libyan coast. The ruling is another illustration of how externalised border control and “pull-back” policies are becoming normalised in Europe.</dc:description>
</dc>
