nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/9b069e1a524bb615 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 250702s2025||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/9b069e1a524bb615 doi eng 342 23 Harb, Malak Author aut Externalising Migration Control - S.S. and Others v Italy Marks A Missed Opportunity for Accountability Harb, Malak Verfassungsblog 2025-07-02 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier On 20th of May 2025, the European Court of Human Rights declared the case of S.S. and others v Italy inadmissible under Art.1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The decision marks a missed opportunity. Instead of addressing the question of functional jurisdiction in the context of externalised migration control, the Court found that Italy does not enjoy extraterritorial jurisdiction over a group of irregular migrants whose ship was wrecked on the high seas near the Libyan coast. The ruling is another illustration of how externalised border control and “pull-back” policies are becoming normalised in Europe. CC BY-SA 4.0 Charta der Grundrechte | Europäische Union ECtHR EU Europa Europarecht Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg Human Rights Human Rights Italy Jurisdiction Migration SAR (DE-588)4619834-9 gnd Charta der Grundrechte | Europäische Union (DE-588)10290611-7 gnd EU (DE-588)4153206-5 gnd Europarecht (DE-588)1003803-6 gnd Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg (DE-588)10298350-1 gnd Human Rights (DE-588)4120730-0 gnd Migration Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/externalising-migration-control/ raw object