<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.7" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-7.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>A Judicial Compromise - The Dutch Supreme Court’s Judgment in the F-35 Parts Case</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal" usage="primary">
    <namePart>Voetelink, Joop</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Author</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Zwanenburg, Marten</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Author</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource/>
  <genre authority="rdacontent">Text</genre>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">xx#</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">2025</dateIssued>
  </originInfo>
  <originInfo eventType="publisher">
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text"/>
    </place>
    <publisher>Verfassungsblog</publisher>
    <dateIssued>2025-10-28</dateIssued>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marccategory">electronic resource</form>
    <form authority="marcsmd">remote</form>
    <form type="media" authority="rdamedia">Computermedien</form>
    <form type="carrier" authority="rdacarrier">Online-Ressource</form>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract displayLabel="Summary">On 3 October 2025, the Supreme Court of the Netherlands handed down its judgment concerning the export of parts for the F-35 jet fighter to Israel. We highlight two notable elements. First, the Court did not follow the teleological interpretation typically taken by the ECJ. Another approach to interpretation of international and EU law could have led to a (partly) different outcome of the case. Second, we agree that, given the State’s discretionary power, civil courts must exercise restraint when dealing with foreign policy and national or international security.</abstract>
  <accessCondition type="use and reproduction">CC BY-SA 4.0</accessCondition>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Voetelink, Joop</note>
  <subject>
    <topic>ATT</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>EUCP</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>F-35 Jet Fighter</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Israel</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Niederlande</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Political Question</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>the Netherlands</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" authority="gnd" xlink:href="(DE-588)4042203-3">
    <topic>Niederlande</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc" edition="23">342</classification>
  <location>
    <url displayLabel="raw object" usage="primary display">https://verfassungsblog.de/f-35-a-judicial-compromise/</url>
  </location>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>Verfassungsblog</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <identifier type="issn">2366-7044</identifier>
    <name>
      <namePart>Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH</namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="doi">10.59704/5c5ff6cf22396d2d</identifier>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">251028</recordCreationDate>
    <recordIdentifier source="DE-Verfassungsblog">10.59704/5c5ff6cf22396d2d</recordIdentifier>
    <recordOrigin>Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl
				(Revision 1.140 20200717)</recordOrigin>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
