nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/271cb028f3e98e30 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 241009s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/271cb028f3e98e30 doi eng 342 23 Rentsch, Bettina Author aut Fanfictioning Critical Theory - Law and Political Economy’s Theory of Science Rentsch, Bettina Verfassungsblog 2024-10-09 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To redeem its commitment to an ‘emancipatory critique’, LPE would do good by supporting itself with a theory of science, or at least an epistemic program. While the critical tradition has raised powerful normative desires, it first and foremost stands for an alternative model of scientific reasoning. LPE, as will be shown, updates much of critical theory’s historical normative claims. Yet, at least from my readings, it appears to be missing out on a theory of science. CC BY-SA 4.0 Critical Legal Studies Lawandpoliticaleconomy legal theory LPE Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/fanfictioning-critical-theory/ raw object