nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20221026-225914-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 221026s2022||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20221026-225914-0 doi eng 342 23 Oidtmann, Raphael Author aut Fighting for a Cause - On Mørck Jensen v. Denmark at the European Court of Human Rights Oidtmann, Raphael Verfassungsblog 2022-10-26 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier On 18 October 2022, the European Court of Human Rights handed down its judgement in the case of Mørck Jensen v. Denmark, upholding the applicant’s conviction under Danish law of breaching the prohibition on entry into and stay in a conflict zone in order to participate in armed hostilities on the side of one party to an ongoing armed conflict. In its judgment, the Court consciously opted to take an objective or neutral stance towards the question of whether there may exist ‘right’ reasons to travel to a hot conflict zone in order to actively participate in armed activities. CC BY-SA 4.0 Denmark ECHR ECtHR ISIL ISIS nullum crimen sine lege Terrorism Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/fighting-for-a-cause/ raw object