Fighting for a Cause - On Mørck Jensen v. Denmark at the European Court of Human Rights
Oidtmann, Raphael
Author
aut
Text
xx#
2022
Verfassungsblog
2022-10-26
eng
On 18 October 2022, the European Court of Human Rights handed down its judgement in the case of Mørck Jensen v. Denmark, upholding the applicant’s conviction under Danish law of breaching the prohibition on entry into and stay in a conflict zone in order to participate in armed hostilities on the side of one party to an ongoing armed conflict. In its judgment, the Court consciously opted to take an objective or neutral stance towards the question of whether there may exist ‘right’ reasons to travel to a hot conflict zone in order to actively participate in armed activities.
CC BY-SA 4.0
Oidtmann, Raphael
Denmark
ECHR
ECtHR
ISIL
ISIS
nullum crimen sine lege
Terrorism
342
https://verfassungsblog.de/fighting-for-a-cause/
Verfassungsblog
2366-7044
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH
10.17176/20221026-225914-0
221026
10.17176/20221026-225914-0
Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl
(Revision 1.140 20200717)