nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/c32759738d1a31ea DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 250804s2025||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/c32759738d1a31ea doi eng 342 23 Bassok, Or Author aut Behemoth v. The Dual State in the Gaza War - On the Role of Law in the Gaza War Bassok, Or Verfassungsblog 2025-08-04 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Fraenkel’s The Dual State (1941) and Neumann’s Behemoth (1942) offer two diverging accounts of the legal reality under National Socialism. The controversy between the two is important not only for the Gaza War, but also for the future of international humanitarian law writ large. The picture, according to which if lawyers had more power post-World War I, democracies in Europe would not have collapsed, affected both constitutional and international law. Yet, the claim that Weimar and the world could have been saved if only the law and lawyers had possessed more power is inaccurate. We are now reliving the consequences of this mistake in the Gaza War. CC BY-SA 4.0 Fraenkel Ernst | 1898–1975 | Politologe; Jurist; Hochschullehrer Gaza Israel Israel Israel and occupied territory Israel-Gaza War Israel-Hamas-Krieg Israeli Supreme Court (DE-588)118534602 gnd Fraenkel Ernst | 1898–1975 | Politologe; Jurist; Hochschullehrer (DE-588)4027808-6 gnd Israel (DE-588)1318875676 gnd Israel-Hamas-Krieg Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/fraenkel-israel-gaza/ raw object