Frontex and ‘Algorithmic Discretion’ (Part II) - Three Accountability Issues
Musco Eklund, Amanda
Author
aut
(orcid)0000-0002-9704-520X
Text
xx#
2022
Verfassungsblog
2022-09-10
eng
Part I of this contribution explains how the regulatory design of the European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) raises issues in relation to the rule of law principle of legality. Essentially, the ETIAS screening rules algorithm illustrates how automation can lead to what I suggest is a new form of arbitrariness. Part II reflects on how these legality issues affect other rule of law principles, including the principle of effective judicial protection. In turn, it raises three accountability issues and calls into question the assumption that the safeguard of manual processing in case of a ‘hit’ is a panacea for all rule of law challenges stemming from this semi-automated decision-making.
CC BY-SA 4.0
Musco Eklund, Amanda
accountability
Algorithmic Decision-making
border control
ETIAS
Rule of Law
342
https://verfassungsblog.de/frontex-and-algorithmic-discretion-part-ii/
Verfassungsblog
2366-7044
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH
10.17176/20220910-110333-0
220910
10.17176/20220910-110333-0
Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl
(Revision 1.140 20200717)