nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/2e71aebd6023d940 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 250807s2025||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/2e71aebd6023d940 doi eng 342 23 Andreotti, Nicolò Author aut Game, Set, Review - RFC Seraing and the Limits of Arbitration Autonomy under EU Law Andreotti, Nicolò Verfassungsblog 2025-08-07 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The long-standing tension between private sports arbitration and the EU’s system of fundamental rights came to a head on 1 August 2025, when the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered its judgment in RFC Seraing v. FIFA. The case addresses whether arbitral awards rendered by the Court of Arbitration for Sport can be insulated from review by EU national courts when EU law is at stake. The judgment represents a restrained but meaningful intervention by the CJEU into the autonomy of sports arbitration, seeking to balance the authority of CAS with the imperative of protective fundamentals rights under EU law. CC BY-SA 4.0 Arbitration Charta der Grundrechte | Europäische Union Court of Arbitration for Sport EU Charter European Charter of Fundamental Rights FIFA Judicial Review (DE-588)4619834-9 gnd Charta der Grundrechte | Europäische Union Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/game-set-review/ raw object