<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/440bc3c8b5c7b80e</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/gender-south-africa-chief-justice/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Weaponising Gender in South Africa’s Chief Justice Appointment - Gender Equality as a Proxy in the War Against Corruption</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Albertyn, Cathi</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2025-08-11</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Abusive Feminism</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>South Africa</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>South African Constitutional Court</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Südafrika</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Südafrika</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Ros Dixon argues that “[p]lacing women in high office reflects commitments to fairness, diversity and equality of opportunity. But it also creates opportunities for anti-feminist, would-be authoritarians to use women’s descriptive representation to advance and legitimate their own sexist, authoritarian projects”. The South African Judicial Services Commission’s interviews for the country’s Chief Justice in 2022 provide a fascinating example of this phenomenon in the context of political struggles around corruption and accountability in South Africa.</dc:description>
</dc>
