<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.7" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-7.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Why Primacy Operates Differently in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice - EPPO, Article 67 TFEU and the Limits of Primacy in Criminal Constitutional Law</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal" usage="primary">
    <namePart>Kotsalis, Philippos-Georgios</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Author</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Heger, Martin</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Author</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource/>
  <genre authority="rdacontent">Text</genre>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">xx#</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">2026</dateIssued>
  </originInfo>
  <originInfo eventType="publisher">
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text"/>
    </place>
    <publisher>Verfassungsblog</publisher>
    <dateIssued>2026-04-15</dateIssued>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marccategory">electronic resource</form>
    <form authority="marcsmd">remote</form>
    <form type="media" authority="rdamedia">Computermedien</form>
    <form type="carrier" authority="rdacarrier">Online-Ressource</form>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract displayLabel="Summary">The EPPO’s anti-corruption mandate meets a constitutional constraint in Greece, where only Parliament may initiate proceedings against ministers. The familiar logic of EU primacy offers no easy way through, as Union law itself leaves gaps and accommodates national procedural orders. What emerges instead is a structural limit: in criminal law, integration proceeds within – not against – constitutional tradition.</abstract>
  <accessCondition type="use and reproduction">CC BY-SA 4.0</accessCondition>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Kotsalis, Philippos-Georgios</note>
  <subject>
    <topic>AFSJ</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Criminal Law</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>EPPO</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Greece</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc" edition="23">342</classification>
  <location>
    <url displayLabel="raw object" usage="primary display">https://verfassungsblog.de/greece-eppo-afsj/</url>
  </location>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>Verfassungsblog</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <identifier type="issn">2366-7044</identifier>
    <name>
      <namePart>Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH</namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="doi">10.59704/2ee01c1005e7bc37</identifier>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">260415</recordCreationDate>
    <recordIdentifier source="DE-Verfassungsblog">10.59704/2ee01c1005e7bc37</recordIdentifier>
    <recordOrigin>Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl
				(Revision 1.140 20200717)</recordOrigin>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
