<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/5aa78dd243fdf63d</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/guatemala-intervention-icj/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Beyond Bilateralism - Article 62 Interventions After the ICJ’s Decision on Guatemala’s Intervention Application in Sovereignty over Sapodilla Cayes (Belize v. Honduras)</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Maghsoudzadeh, Zahra</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Newman, Dwight</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-03-20</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Guatemala</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Guatemala</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>ICJ</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>ICJ Statute</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>International Court of Justice</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Internationaler Gerichtshof | Den Haag</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Third-Party Intervention</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Guatemala</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Internationaler Gerichtshof | Den Haag</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>On March 19, 2026, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) rendered a historic, unanimous judgment in Sovereignty over the Sapodilla Cayes/Cayos Zapotillos (Belize v. Honduras) – Application by Guatemala for Permission to Intervene. The ICJ has traditionally been extremely cautious in permitting third-state interventions in cases, but it has now responded to ongoing critiques of that position and has opened up the possibilities for intervention in meaningful ways. In some ways, it may have shifted its approach to intervention toward a more permissive model, similar to that of many constitutional courts.</dc:description>
</dc>
