nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/1ae85f87e5251c93 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 260217s2026||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/1ae85f87e5251c93 doi eng 342 23 Lumerding, Anna Author aut High Thresholds and Wide Margins - Fliegenschnee and Others v. Austria and the Consolidation of the ECtHR’s Climate Jurisprudence Lumerding, Anna Verfassungsblog 2026-02-17 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) issued an inadmissibility declaration in the climate case of Fliegenschnee and Others v. Austria. While an unsuccessful outcome was expected, the decision nevertheless clarifies three aspects of the Court’s climate jurisprudence. Taken together, the case shows that the Court neither demanded more than in previous cases nor reneged on its requirements as laid down in Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland. CC BY-SA 4.0 Climate Crisis climate litigation ECtHR KlimaSeniorinnen Right to Property Standing Victimhood Maurer, Melanie Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/high-thresholds-and-wide-margins/ raw object