<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20200611-133645-0</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/homosexuality-as-a-form-of-expression/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Homosexuality as a Form of Expression - Diverse Adjudication on Constitutional Protection of Sexual identity in Asia and Africa</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Goel, Bharatt</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2020-06-11</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Criminalization of Homosexuality</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Discrimination</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Freedom of Expression</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Numerous courts have dealt with the question whether the sexual identity of an individual enjoys constitutional protection as freedom of expression. Recently, Singapore’s Supreme Court has rejected this understanding of the freedom of expression which highlights the different approaches of courts across countries like Singapore, India, Botswana, and Kenya.</dc:description>
</dc>
