<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20260402-173329-0</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/human-rights-of-the-mind/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Litigating Human Rights of the Mind - U.S. Social Media Litigation as a Wake-Up Call for Human Rights</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Hertz, Nora</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-04-02</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Freedom of Thought</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Google</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Meta</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Mind</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Neurorights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>USA</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>YouTube</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>USA</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Last week, two U.S. courts for the first time found Meta and Google (YouTube) liable for inflicting harm on users and for violating consumer protection law. These rulings have a signalling effect on Europe, and initial reactions have already placed great hope in them. Human rights organisations celebrated them as a “watershed” for big tech accountability. The rulings were based on consumer protection law and negligence (tort law). Nonetheless, they could arguably be a potential driver for human rights litigation.</dc:description>
</dc>
