<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20170913-123503</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/hungarian-constitutional-identity-and-the-ecj-decision-on-refugee-quota/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Hungarian Constitutional Identity and the ECJ Decision on Refugee Quota</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Nagy-Nádasdi, Anita Rozália</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Kőhalmi, Barbara</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2017-09-08</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Constitutional Identity</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Hungarian Constitutional Court</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Resettlement</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>The outcome of the lawsuit launched by the Hungarian Government against the EU Council’s decision on compulsory relocation of asylum seekers before the European Court of Justice (ECJ) took no-one by surprise, neither in Budapest nor elsewhere. Some may have hoped that the complaint would succeed legally, but nevertheless it has always been primarily a part of a well-devised political strategy based on the idea of national identity as a concept of constitutional and EU law.</dc:description>
</dc>
