nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/9723242bfd01f0d8 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 250910s2025||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/9723242bfd01f0d8 doi eng 342 23 Madarasi, Anna Author aut To Uniformity and Beyond - Hungary’s Supreme Court and the Implementation of CJEU Rulings Madarasi, Anna Verfassungsblog 2025-09-10 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier After the Hungarian judiciary had already faced controversy over the preliminary reference procedure under Article 267 TFEU in the question phase, a new tension has emerged. The supreme judicial body in Hungary now seeks to intervene in the answer phase of the procedure – aiming to shape the referring court’s interpretation and application of the CJEU’s ruling. These dynamics foreshadow an institutional conflict over how the Hungarian judiciary internalizes and operationalizes the jurisprudence of the CJEU. At stake is the fulfillment of the principle of sincere cooperation enshrined in Article 4(3) TEU. CC BY-SA 4.0 Art. 267 TFEU ECJ EU Law European Court of Justice Hungary Implementation of EU Law Referral to the ECJ Ungarn Vorabentscheidungsverfahren effectiveness primacy of EU law uniform application uniform interpretation (DE-588)4078541-5 gnd Ungarn (DE-588)4127136-1 gnd Vorabentscheidungsverfahren Kende, Tamás Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/hungary-preliminary-reference/ raw object