<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.7" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-7.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>To Uniformity and Beyond - Hungary’s Supreme Court and the Implementation of CJEU Rulings</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal" usage="primary">
    <namePart>Madarasi, Anna</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Author</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Kende, Tamás</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Author</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource/>
  <genre authority="rdacontent">Text</genre>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">xx#</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">2025</dateIssued>
  </originInfo>
  <originInfo eventType="publisher">
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text"/>
    </place>
    <publisher>Verfassungsblog</publisher>
    <dateIssued>2025-09-10</dateIssued>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marccategory">electronic resource</form>
    <form authority="marcsmd">remote</form>
    <form type="media" authority="rdamedia">Computermedien</form>
    <form type="carrier" authority="rdacarrier">Online-Ressource</form>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract displayLabel="Summary">After the Hungarian judiciary had already faced controversy over the preliminary reference procedure under Article 267 TFEU in the question phase, a new tension has emerged. The supreme judicial body in Hungary now seeks to intervene in the answer phase of the procedure – aiming to shape the referring court’s interpretation and application of the CJEU’s ruling. These dynamics foreshadow an institutional conflict over how the Hungarian judiciary internalizes and operationalizes the jurisprudence of the CJEU. At stake is the fulfillment of the principle of sincere cooperation enshrined in Article 4(3) TEU.</abstract>
  <accessCondition type="use and reproduction">CC BY-SA 4.0</accessCondition>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Madarasi, Anna</note>
  <subject>
    <topic>Art. 267 TFEU</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>ECJ</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>EU Law</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>European Court of Justice</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Hungary</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Implementation of EU Law</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Referral to the ECJ</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Ungarn</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Vorabentscheidungsverfahren</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>effectiveness</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>primacy of EU law</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>uniform application</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>uniform interpretation</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" authority="gnd" xlink:href="(DE-588)4078541-5">
    <topic>Ungarn</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" authority="gnd" xlink:href="(DE-588)4127136-1">
    <topic>Vorabentscheidungsverfahren</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc" edition="23">342</classification>
  <location>
    <url displayLabel="raw object" usage="primary display">https://verfassungsblog.de/hungary-preliminary-reference/</url>
  </location>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>Verfassungsblog</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <identifier type="issn">2366-7044</identifier>
    <name>
      <namePart>Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH</namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="doi">10.59704/9723242bfd01f0d8</identifier>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">250910</recordCreationDate>
    <recordIdentifier source="DE-Verfassungsblog">10.59704/9723242bfd01f0d8</recordIdentifier>
    <recordOrigin>Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl
				(Revision 1.140 20200717)</recordOrigin>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
