<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/e85da74bfcc4e06d</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/hybrid-attacks/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>The Claim of Hybrid Attacks - Balancing State Sovereignty and Migrants’ Rights at the European Court of Human Rights</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Beuscher, Alison Jolynn</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Bücker, Johanna</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Goller, Laura</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Möller, Lina Sophie</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Stiller, Marlene</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Pfeiffer, Sarah Isabel</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2025-02-21</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>European Court of Human Rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Human Rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Migrant Instrumentalisation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Schengen Borders Code</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>migrant rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>At the European Union’s external borders, migrants are being instrumentalized in geopolitical conflicts, as seen in cases before the European Court of Human Rights concerning pushbacks at the EU-Belarus border. Poland, Latvia, and Lithuania justify these measures as responses to a “hybrid war,” while critics warn against eroding non-refoulement protections. The Court’s ruling will be crucial in defining the balance between state security and human rights.</dc:description>
</dc>
