<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20200605-013346-0</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/in-praise-of-uncertainty/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>In Praise of Uncertainty - The Constitutional Court’s PSPP Decision</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Miller, Russell A.</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2020-06-04</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>BVerfG</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Constitutional Pluralism</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Diversity</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>ECJ</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>PSPP</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Ultra Vires</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>The Bundesverfassungsgericht's PSPP decision will have immense consequences.  I have no reason to doubt the alarm raised by so many informed and respected commentators.  But here’s one small thing that has been lost in the debate so far.  The Court’s decision to go its own way on a question of European law might be seen as evidence of the influence of the common law tradition in the European legal system.  That’s no bad thing, and it’s probably unavoidable in any case.</dc:description>
</dc>
