nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20200618-124127-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 200618s2020||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20200618-124127-0 doi eng 342 23 Briki, Aymen Author aut Inherited Confusion - COVID-19, Tunisian Democracy, and the Adoption of the French Doctrine Briki, Aymen Verfassungsblog 2020-06-18 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Necessitas non habet legem, this ancient maxim meaning that necessity has no law appears to be applicable to Tunisia during the pandemic. The Tunisian authorities rapidly took measures to fight the coronavirus outbreak. But the broad language used in the legal texts ruling the COVID-19 crisis – such as the constitution and the various governmental and presidential decrees – combined with legal doctrine likening Tunisia’s constitutional emergency clause to that of France have added to the confusion of power. This is not only endangering the newly installed democratic government but illustrates how the adoption of a foreign constitutional framework impacts new democracies, making it difficult for the Tunisian constitutional system to evolve. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Constitutional Law Coronavirus COVID 19 Emergency Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/inherited-confusion/ raw object