nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/17a9e57ca39eea36 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240708s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/17a9e57ca39eea36 doi eng 342 23 Eboe-Osuji, Chile Author aut Why the International Criminal Court’s Jurisdiction Doctrinally Attaches to Israeli and Russian Nationals Eboe-Osuji, Chile Verfassungsblog 2024-07-08 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier As the storm of ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan’s request for arrest warrants loomed and landed on Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and his Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, ardent supporters of Israel within the U.S. and U.K. governments and beyond appear to have seized upon a jurisdictional objection. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken is reported as saying that the “ICC has no jurisdiction over this matter.” The U.K. Foreign Secretary David Cameron is reported to have said the same thing. There is a basic flaw, though, in the treaty-based objection to the ICC jurisdiction as has been made. It ignores the nature of the mandate of international criminal tribunals as mechanisms for the effective preservation of the basic fabric of the international order. CC BY-SA 4.0 ICC International Criminal Court Israel-Gaza War Israel-Hamas War Russian War against Ukraine Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/international-criminal-court-jurisdiction-israel-russia/ raw object