Jeopardizing Judicial Dialogue is Contrary to EU Law - The AG Opinion in the IS case
Bárd, Petra
Author
aut
Text
xx#
2021
Verfassungsblog
2021-04-20
eng
On 15 April 2021, AG Pikamäe delivered his opinion in the IS case, originating from a Hungarian criminal proceeding against a Swedish national. The national judge referred three questions for preliminary reference to the CJEU, one regarding the suspect’s right to translation and two regarding the general status of judicial independence in Hungary. As a reaction, the Hungarian Prosecutor General initiated a so-called “appeal in the interests of the law” and the Hungarian Supreme Court held the reference to be unlawful.
CC BY-SA 4.0
Bárd, Petra
CJEU
Hungary
judicial independence
preliminary reference
342
https://verfassungsblog.de/jeopardizing-judicial-dialogue-is-contrary-to-eu-law/
Verfassungsblog
2366-7044
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH
10.17176/20210420-184733-0
210420
10.17176/20210420-184733-0
Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl
(Revision 1.140 20200717)