Judicial Acquiescence to Presidential Immigration - Abandoning Administrative Law in a Crisis
Shah, Bijal
Author
aut
Text
xx#
2025
Verfassungsblog
2025-07-10
eng
Mahmoud Khalil, Kilmar Ábrego García, and Rumeysa Ozturk are just a few of the people against whom the second Trump Administration has openly engaged in alarming forms of immigration enforcement. There is an underappreciated way in which the Supreme Court has defanged the judiciary’s systemic ability to confront the executive branch’s illegal immigration behavior: It has failed to draw on U.S. administrative law. In doing so, it has diminished a vital structural judicial check on presidential power – one that lower courts, and even a future Supreme Court, may find increasingly difficult to deploy.
CC BY-SA 4.0
Shah, Bijal
Administrative Law
Agency
Deportation
Immigration
Presidential power
Trump Donald | 1946- | Geschäftsmann Unternehmer Politiker
USA. Supreme Court
Trump Donald | 1946- | Geschäftsmann Unternehmer Politiker
USA. Supreme Court
342
https://verfassungsblog.de/judicial-acquiescence-to-presidential-immigration/
Verfassungsblog
2366-7044
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH
10.59704/630b6088ad6bdd16
250710
10.59704/630b6088ad6bdd16
Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl
(Revision 1.140 20200717)