nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/4f232f13b9148552 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 250916s2025||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/4f232f13b9148552 doi eng 342 23 Bañuelos, Jorge Alejandro Carrillo Author aut Judicial Convergence on Climate Change - The Advisory Opinions of the ICJ, the IACtHR, and the ITLOS  Bañuelos, Jorge Alejandro Carrillo Verfassungsblog 2025-09-16 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In just over a year, three of the world’s most prominent courts have addressed States’ legal obligations in the context of climate change. Although each court examined various questions from its own unique institutional and legal standpoint, their conclusions showed a significant convergence on several key issues, including the role of science, the standard of due diligence, the duty to cooperate, the role of private actors, the importance of human rights, and the need for reparations. This blog post explores each court’s consideration of these issues. CC BY-SA 4.0 Samuel, Susan Ann Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/judicial-convergence-on-climate-change/ raw object