<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/b85e0a8dd922d7cd</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/judicial-remunerations/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Paying Judges Properly - CJEU’s Criteria on Judicial Remuneration in Hungary</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>G. Szabó, Dániel</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2025-03-07</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Joined Cases C‑146/23 and C‑374/23</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Judicial Independance</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Judicial remunerations</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Ungarn</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Ungarn</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>On 22 February, several thousand marched in Budapest for an independent judiciary, including fair pay for judges. Three days later, the CJEU issued a decision in Joined Cases C‑146/23 and C‑374/23, setting out the EU law criteria for judges’ remuneration. The decision sets general minimum criteria for the remuneration of judges to guarantee their independence and is highly relevant for Hungary, where the salary pathway for judges is not set by law, it is not judicially enforceable, and the entire system lacks foreseeability.</dc:description>
</dc>
