nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20160613-125518 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 160613s2016||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20160613-125518 doi eng 342 23 Johansen, Stian Øby Author aut Jurisdiction, legislation, and creative interpretations in the Opinion of AG Wathelet in C-72/15 Rosneft Johansen, Stian Øby Verfassungsblog 2016-06-13 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The frequent legal challenges to the European Union’s economic sanctions regimes have resulted in several judgments chiseling out key issues of EU law. Case C-72/15 Rosneft, which will be decided in the coming months, provides the European Court of Justice (ECJ) yet another opportunity to do so. In particular, the Rosneft case invites the ECJ to clarify its jurisdiction and power of judicial review over decisions taken by the Council under the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) – in the context of a reference for preliminary ruling. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Common Foreign and Security Policy ECJ Jurisdiction Rosneft Sanctions Arnesen, Alexander Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/jurisdiction-legislation-and-creative-interpretations-in-the-opinion-of-ag-wathelet-in-c-7215-rosneft/ raw object