nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20220410-011137-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 220409s2022||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20220410-011137-0 doi eng 342 23 Johnson, Ben Author aut Justice Thomas Will Not Recuse. But Should He? Johnson, Ben Verfassungsblog 2022-04-09 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There is a growing elite and scholarly consensus (at least on the American left) that Justice Clarence Thomas “must immediately recuse himself from any cases relating to the 2020 election and its aftermath.” The demand is extraordinary, and as such, it has captured global attention. The dispute highlights some notable things about the Court, but it is the scandal that really captures attention. So far, calls for recusal have come almost exclusively from the left. Conservatives have dismissed the idea. What to make of it all? CC BY-SA 4.0 Clarence Thomas Donald Trump US Supreme Court Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/justice-thomas-will-not-recuse-but-should-he/ raw object