nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20160311-151627 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 160311s2016||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20160311-151627 doi eng 342 23 Hailbronner, Kay Author aut Legal Requirements for the EU-Turkey Refugee Agreement: A Reply to J. Hathaway Hailbronner, Kay Verfassungsblog 2016-03-11 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There are many open questions and objections against the EU-Turkey deal on an agreement whose details are yet to be negotiated to manage the Syrian refugee crisis. In particular on the reciprocity part: could the agreement as an easily available tool by Turkey to blackmail visa liberalization and progress in the EU Accession negotiations? How will the EU make sure the proper treatment of all returnees? How is the resettlement of refugees from Syria to the EU (and to Germany) going to take place? James Hathaway on this blog has listed three legal requirements for the agreement to be legal. In my view none of these are likely to block an agreement. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Collective Expulsion EU-Turkey Agreement Geneva Refugee Convention Non Refoulement Refugee Protection Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/legal-requirements-for-the-eu-turkey-refugee-agreement-a-reply-to-j-hathaway/ raw object