<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/d296ddbf9d8fc194</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/legislating-animal-rights/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Legislating Animal Rights</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Bernet Kempers, Eva</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-02-02</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>RIghts of Nature</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Rechtssubjekt</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>animal legal personhood</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>animal rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>legal person</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>legal personhood</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Rechtssubjekt</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>In late 2025, Satipo, a provincial municipality in Peru, recognized the legal rights of “stingless bees” to exist, maintain healthy populations, live in a healthy environment, and conserve and regenerate their habitat. What stands out is that the Peruvian ordinance gives shape to animal rights in a way that differs markedly from the traditional framing of animal rights as a social justice movement aimed at liberating all animals from human exploitation: it recognizes only one type of animal as a subject of rights. This illustrates that scholarship on animal rights may not be keeping pace with the reality of how animal rights are developing in practice.</dc:description>
</dc>
