nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20220929-110346-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 220929s2022||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20220929-110346-0 doi eng 342 23 Young, Alison Author aut (orcid)0000-0002-9881-965X Lessons from the United Kingdom’s “Enemies of the People” case - Coping Strategies: Domestic and International Courts in Times of Backlash Young, Alison Verfassungsblog 2022-09-29 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier It is difficult to deny evidence of a potential backlash against the judiciary in the UK. Both Miller decisions sent shockwaves through the United Kingdom. This is despite both decisions having the effect of protecting the powers of Parliament rather than the courts, and both having a marginal, if any, impact on the ability of the UK government to achieve its desired Brexit outcome. It is hard to forget the ‘Enemies of the People’ headline following the first Miller decision. CC BY-SA 4.0 enemies of the people judicial independence Miller case United Kingodm Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/lessons-from-the-united-kingdoms-enemies-of-the-people-case/ raw object