<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/e807d3c3a383efd9</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/long-live-nottebohm/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Long Live Nottebohm - The Potential Revival of Nottebohm at 70 in Commission v Malta</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Wagner, Lorin-Johannes</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2024-04-26</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU citizenship</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Malta</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Malta</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Nottebohn</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Malta</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Next year, Nottebohm will be turning 70. Only very recently, Weiler, on this blog, made the point that the argument of a genuine link – underpinning the case of the Commission against the Maltese golden passport scheme – is unconvincing and rests on a “tendentious reading of Nottebohm”. Yet, in Commission v Malta, the CJEU may well reinvigorate a European debate about the genuine links that bind us. I, for once, would argue it is high time to make the point that nationality is not just anything a State makes of it.</dc:description>
</dc>
