<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/82c25e98437ab662</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/looking-sideways/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Looking Sideways - The Comparative Law Process and Climate Change Case-Law Before the European Court of Human Rights</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Kondak, Rachael</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-06-29</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Climate Justice</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Europa</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>European Court of Human Rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Klima</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Subsidiarity</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>judicial dialogue</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Europa</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Klima</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>What are the major interpretative principles which assist the European Court of Human Rights in its decision-making? What role do they play in climate change judgments? Subsidiarity, the living instrument doctrine and a harmonious interpretation of international law all enable the Court to incorporate relevant comparative law into its reasoning. Climate change case-law is particularly well-suited to the comparative law approach and I argue that the role of comparative law can potentially have more impact in this emerging area of the law than in others.</dc:description>
</dc>
