<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/548591d08886598c</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/lost-in-translation/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Lost in Translation? - The Right to a Healthy Environment</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Wenzel, Nicola</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>ger</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2025-12-06</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Climate Crisis</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Comparative Law</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>ECHR</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>environmental law</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>IACtHR</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Right to a healthy environment</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Judicial conversations and interactions take place in different settings – sometimes behind closed doors, sometimes out in the open. One open form of conversation is the use of comparative analysis in legal arguments. Focusing on comparative arguments in policy discussions on the right to a healthy environment within the Council of Europe, I will argue that comparative arguments are too often cursory and superficial and that calls for the transferral of elements from one human rights system to another tend to underestimate the complexities involved in such legal transplants.</dc:description>
</dc>
