nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20200418-182547-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 200418s2020||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20200418-182547-0 doi eng 342 23 Bárd, Petra Author aut Luxembourg’s Unworkable Test to Protect the Rule of Law in the EU - Decoding the Amsterdam and Karlsruhe Courts’ post-LM Rulings (Part I) Bárd, Petra Verfassungsblog 2020-04-18 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier A key rule of law case illustrating the conversation taking place between national judges and the Court of Justice about the how-to of rule of law protection is the CJEU’s LM ruling dealing with the implementation of the European Arrest Warrant. In it the CJEU developed a test to balance mutual trust and individual rights, particularly the right to a fair trial. The Rechtbank Amsterdam and the Karlsruhe Oberlandesgericht applied Luxembourg’s LM test with respect to Polish suspects in a series of recent (interlocutory) rulings. This national case-law is interesting both for its immediate outcome (suspension of surrenders) and its implicit message to Luxembourg: “Sorry, we tried, but your test is unworkable.” CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 European Arrest Warrant judicial dialogue judicial independence Poland Rule of Law Morijn, John Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/luxembourgs-unworkable-test-to-protect-the-rule-of-law-in-the-eu/ raw object