<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<marc21:record xmlns:marc21="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <marc21:leader>nam  22     uu 4500</marc21:leader>
  <marc21:controlfield tag="001">10.17176/20170216-160144</marc21:controlfield>
  <marc21:controlfield tag="003">DE-Verfassungsblog</marc21:controlfield>
  <marc21:controlfield tag="007">cr|||||</marc21:controlfield>
  <marc21:controlfield tag="008">140430s2014||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|ger||</marc21:controlfield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">10.17176/20170216-160144</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="2">doi</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">ger</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">342</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="2">23</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Scheppele, Kim Lane</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="e">Author</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="4">aut</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Making Infringement Procedures More Effective:  A Comment on Commission v. Hungary</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="c">Scheppele, Kim Lane</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
    <marc21:subfield code="b">Verfassungsblog</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="c">2014-04-30</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Text</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="b">txt</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="2">rdacontent</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Computermedien</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="b">c</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="2">rdamedia</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="b">cr</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="2">rdacarrier</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">On 8 April, Hungary lost again at the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ).  The European Commission had alleged that that Hungary violated the independence of its data protection officer and the ECJ agreed.  The case broke little new legal ground.   But it is important nonetheless because it signals serious trouble within the EU.   The case exposes Hungary’s ongoing challenge to the EU’s fundamental principles.  And it exposes the limitations of ordinary infringement proceedings for bringing a Member State back into line.</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="t">Verfassungsblog</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="x">2366-7044</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
    <marc21:subfield code="u">https://verfassungsblog.de/making-infringement-procedures-more-effective-a-comment-on-commission-v-hungary/</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="y">raw object</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
</marc21:record>
