<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/1d31358c456f75cc</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/miladze-echr/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>The Politics of Provocation - The ECtHR’s Ruling in Miladze v Georgia</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Bouché, Gionata</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-07-07</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Art. 10 ECHR</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>European Convention on Human Rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>European Court of Human Rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention (1950 November 4)</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Freedom of Expression</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Georgia</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Meinungsfreiheit</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention (1950 November 4)</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Meinungsfreiheit</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>A recent judgment of the European Court of Human Rights concerning a TikTok video published by a Georgian self-defined civil activist adds another layer to the Court’s increasingly messy Article 10 case law. The applicant repeatedly insulted public officials in crude and sexually explicit terms while broadcasting to a large online audience. Domestic courts imposed only a modest administrative fine, later reduced on appeal. The ECtHR did not find a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression – raising several questions about the limits of legitimate political speech online.</dc:description>
</dc>
