nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/8b7660dae3e1776d DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 260304s2026||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/8b7660dae3e1776d doi eng 342 23 Ziebritzki, Catharina Author aut Narratives for Strategic Litigation - On the ECtHR’s Migration-Related Jurisprudence Ziebritzki, Catharina Verfassungsblog 2026-03-04 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To make sense of the migration-related jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), scholars tend to identify a certain logic, story or direction in which the case law develops. My point here is not that a certain narrative is correct or another is wrong. Instead, I want to draw attention to the fact that, as Janna Wessels and Jürgen Bast have recently shown, there are three competing narratives, and that it is important to be aware of these – not only, but especially for actors engaged in strategic litigation. CC BY-SA 4.0 Asyl ECtHR Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention (1950 November 4). Protokolle usw. (2013 Oktober 2) Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg Migration migrant rights (DE-588)4143260-5 gnd Asyl (DE-588)1362802786 gnd Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention (1950 November 4). Protokolle usw. (2013 Oktober 2) (DE-588)1003803-6 gnd Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg (DE-588)4120730-0 gnd Migration Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/narratives-for-strategic-litigation/ raw object