Narratives for Strategic Litigation - On the ECtHR’s Migration-Related Jurisprudence Ziebritzki, Catharina Author aut Text xx# 2026 Verfassungsblog 2026-03-04 eng
electronic resource
remote
Computermedien
Online-Ressource
 To make sense of the migration-related jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), scholars tend to identify a certain logic, story or direction in which the case law develops. My point here is not that a certain narrative is correct or another is wrong. Instead, I want to draw attention to the fact that, as Janna Wessels and Jürgen Bast have recently shown, there are three competing narratives, and that it is important to be aware of these – not only, but especially for actors engaged in strategic litigation. CC BY-SA 4.0 Ziebritzki, Catharina Asyl ECtHR Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention (1950 November 4). Protokolle usw. (2013 Oktober 2) Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg Migration migrant rights Asyl Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention (1950 November 4). Protokolle usw. (2013 Oktober 2) Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg Migration 342 https://verfassungsblog.de/narratives-for-strategic-litigation/ Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH 10.59704/8b7660dae3e1776d 260304 10.59704/8b7660dae3e1776d Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl (Revision 1.140 20200717)