<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/c5160d2ce7031c62</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/nato-would-be-dead/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>“NATO Would Be Dead” - Five Questions to Marko Milanović</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Milanović, Marko</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Bönnemann, Maxim</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-01-16</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Annexation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Greenland</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Grönland</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>NATO</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>NATO</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Trump Donald | 1946- | Geschäftsmann Unternehmer Politiker</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>USA</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>United Nations</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Use of Force</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Grönland</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>NATO</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Trump Donald | 1946- | Geschäftsmann Unternehmer Politiker</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>USA</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>“Anything less” than U.S. control of Greenland is “unacceptable.” With those words this week, President Donald Trump reignited fears that a U.S. annexation of Greenland could move from rhetoric to reality. As European governments move to reassure Denmark of their support and solidarity, one thing is already clear: if the Greenland annexation scenario were to materialize, nothing would be the same again. We spoke with Marko Milanović about how international law would respond to such a scenario – and what a Greenland annexation would mean for the future of NATO.</dc:description>
</dc>
