nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/c5160d2ce7031c62 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 260116s2026||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/c5160d2ce7031c62 doi eng 342 23 Milanović, Marko Author aut “NATO Would Be Dead” - Five Questions to Marko Milanović Milanović, Marko Verfassungsblog 2026-01-16 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier “Anything less” than U.S. control of Greenland is “unacceptable.” With those words this week, President Donald Trump reignited fears that a U.S. annexation of Greenland could move from rhetoric to reality. As European governments move to reassure Denmark of their support and solidarity, one thing is already clear: if the Greenland annexation scenario were to materialize, nothing would be the same again. We spoke with Marko Milanović about how international law would respond to such a scenario – and what a Greenland annexation would mean for the future of NATO. CC BY-SA 4.0 Annexation Greenland Grönland NATO NATO Trump Donald | 1946- | Geschäftsmann Unternehmer Politiker USA United Nations Use of Force (DE-588)4022113-1 gnd Grönland (DE-588)377-3 gnd NATO (DE-588)118834312 gnd Trump Donald | 1946- | Geschäftsmann Unternehmer Politiker (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd USA Bönnemann, Maxim Author aut (orcid)0000-0002-0095-3747 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/nato-would-be-dead/ raw object