nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20221117-215649-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 221117s2022||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20221117-215649-0 doi eng 342 23 Leino-Sandberg, Päivi Author aut Nature Restoration and Fundamental Rights - National budgetary sovereignty as a constraint to EU legislative competence Leino-Sandberg, Päivi Verfassungsblog 2022-11-17 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This year’s most heated topic of constitutional contestation in Finland is likely to be the Commission’s recent proposal for nature restoration. While nature restoration has an innocent sound, the matter actually involves a broad spectrum of constitutional issues. In this debate, political undesirability has turned into claims about the EU’s lacking competence in regulating forests and a general failure to respect the principle of subsidiarity. Last Friday the Finnish Parliament’s Constitutional Law Committee approved an interesting statement of principle, which is likely to affect the country’s stance on EU (fiscal) integration far beyond the question of nature restoration. CC BY-SA 4.0 constitutional fundamental rights nature restoration Right to Property Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/nature-restoration-and-fundamental-rights/ raw object