nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20170330-151028 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 151009s2015||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20170330-151028 doi eng 342 23 Lynskey, Orla Author aut Negotiating the Data Protection Thicket: Life in the Aftermath of Schrems Lynskey, Orla Verfassungsblog 2015-10-09 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The Schrems judgment of the ECJ has implications for the viability of the commercial practices of Internet giants (and minions), for the legality of state surveillance practices and for the future sustainability of an Internet that is global rather than parochial. It is thus not surprising that the Court of Justice of the EU delivered its judgment only one week after the Opinion of the Advocate General and that this judgment has attracted so much academic and media attention, including through the existing commentary on this blog. In adding to this commentary, I shall not rehash the well-versed facts but shall focus on three points which I found striking. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 EuGH legal certainty Schrems Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/negotiating-the-data-protection-thicket-life-in-the-aftermath-of-schrems-2/ raw object