nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/9baf9e72e1339160 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 250910s2025||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/9baf9e72e1339160 doi eng 342 23 Chacón, Jennifer M. Author aut Whose Common Sense? - Some Reflections on Noem v. Vazquez Perdomo Chacón, Jennifer M. Verfassungsblog 2025-09-10 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier On September 8, 2025, in the case of Noem v. Vazquez Perdomo, the Supreme Court signaled its support for ICE’s continued use of racial profiling in immigration policing. By staying a lower court’s restraining order, the Court allowed agents once again to stop and arrest people based on how they look, the language they speak, where they live, and the kind of work they do. The closest the Court came to providing reasons for its intervention came in the form of a non-precedential concurrence authored by Justice Kavanaugh. In it, “common sense” is doing the heavy lifting, just as it has in the Court’s immigration policing jurisprudence for decades, at the expense of facts, evidence, and individual rights. CC BY-SA 4.0 Immigration Racial Profiling Racism US Supreme Court USA. Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd USA. Supreme Court Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/noem-ice-supremecourt/ raw object