<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-04-03T18:46:31Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:verfassungsblog.de/100396" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://verfassungsblog.de/oai/repository/</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <header>
      <identifier>oai:verfassungsblog.de/100396</identifier>
      <datestamp>2026-03-24T18:00:43Z</datestamp>
      <setSpec>posts</setSpec>
    </header>
    <metadata>
      <dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
        <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/337185a89146c666</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/when-caution-is-justified/</dc:identifier>
        <dc:title>When Caution is Justified - The EU Court of Justice and the Right to Be Free from Religious Discrimination</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>van den Brink, Martijn</dc:creator>
        <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
        <dc:date>2026-01-12</dc:date>
        <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Discrimination</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Neutrality</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Religious Fredom</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
        <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
        <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
        <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
        <dc:description>Little CJEU case law has been as fiercely criticised as that relating to the right to be free from religious discrimination. However, the CJEU recently found a sympathiser in Ronan McCrea. He argues that the approach is one of “justifiable caution”. Despite my disagreements with him, I believe that we must take McCrea’s position seriously to be able to develop a more fine-grained view of when caution is warranted. At the same time, I still firmly believe that the case law on religious clothing reveals deeply troubling attitudes toward Muslim women that have no place under anti-discrimination law.</dc:description>
      </dc>
    </metadata>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
