2026-04-07T11:08:41Z https://verfassungsblog.de/oai/repository/

oai:verfassungsblog.de/100504 2026-01-28T09:36:39Z posts

http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/c5160d2ce7031c62 https://verfassungsblog.de/nato-would-be-dead/ “NATO Would Be Dead” - Five Questions to Marko Milanović Milanović, Marko Bönnemann, Maxim eng 2026-01-16 electronic resource text/html ddc:342 Annexation Greenland Grönland NATO NATO Trump Donald | 1946- | Geschäftsmann Unternehmer Politiker USA United Nations Use of Force Grönland NATO Trump Donald | 1946- | Geschäftsmann Unternehmer Politiker USA Verfassungsblog Verfassungsblog--2366-7044 CC BY-SA 4.0 “Anything less” than U.S. control of Greenland is “unacceptable.” With those words this week, President Donald Trump reignited fears that a U.S. annexation of Greenland could move from rhetoric to reality. As European governments move to reassure Denmark of their support and solidarity, one thing is already clear: if the Greenland annexation scenario were to materialize, nothing would be the same again. We spoke with Marko Milanović about how international law would respond to such a scenario – and what a Greenland annexation would mean for the future of NATO.