2026-04-19T01:03:22Z https://verfassungsblog.de/oai/repository/

oai:verfassungsblog.de/100930 2026-02-09T08:14:46Z posts

http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/4adc61a19deaacd8 https://verfassungsblog.de/when-judges-fall-silent/ When Judges Fall Silent - Why Neutrality is a Goal, Not a Given Dörr, Carolin eng 2026-02-06 electronic resource text/html ddc:342 Verfassungsblog Verfassungsblog--2366-7044 CC BY-SA 4.0 Neutrality is the buzzword of our time. It dominates debates about rainbow flags in members’ offices of the Bundestag, Germany’s federal parliament, or judges who wear a headscarf. The desire for a neutral state – and neutral judges in particular – is entirely understandable and perfectly legitimate. The principle of neutrality is meant to prevent bias and partiality and thus ensure equal treatment for all. And yet, according to a recent survey, by 2025 only just over half of respondents in Germany still believed that courts treat everyone equally. So, what is going wrong?