2026-05-27T14:25:40Z https://verfassungsblog.de/oai/repository/

oai:verfassungsblog.de/101286 2026-03-04T07:55:14Z posts

http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/8b7660dae3e1776d https://verfassungsblog.de/narratives-for-strategic-litigation/ Narratives for Strategic Litigation - On the ECtHR’s Migration-Related Jurisprudence Ziebritzki, Catharina eng 2026-03-04 electronic resource text/html ddc:342 Asyl ECtHR Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention (1950 November 4). Protokolle usw. (2013 Oktober 2) Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg Migration migrant rights Asyl Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention (1950 November 4). Protokolle usw. (2013 Oktober 2) Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg Migration Verfassungsblog Verfassungsblog--2366-7044 CC BY-SA 4.0 To make sense of the migration-related jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), scholars tend to identify a certain logic, story or direction in which the case law develops. My point here is not that a certain narrative is correct or another is wrong. Instead, I want to draw attention to the fact that, as Janna Wessels and Jürgen Bast have recently shown, there are three competing narratives, and that it is important to be aware of these – not only, but especially for actors engaged in strategic litigation.