<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-05-26T16:52:23Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:verfassungsblog.de/102171" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://verfassungsblog.de/oai/repository/</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <header>
      <identifier>oai:verfassungsblog.de/102171</identifier>
      <datestamp>2026-03-26T17:40:15Z</datestamp>
      <setSpec>posts</setSpec>
    </header>
    <metadata>
      <dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
        <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/eea76fd8caa3097d</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/tiktok-design-eu/</dc:identifier>
        <dc:title>Towards a Legal Concept of Digital Well-Being  - Insights from the EU Commission’s Preliminary Findings on TikTok’s Addictive Design</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Baranowska, Nina</dc:creator>
        <dc:creator>Malgieri, Gianclaudio</dc:creator>
        <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
        <dc:date>2026-03-26</dc:date>
        <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>DSA</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Digital Services Act</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Digitale-Dienste-Gesetz</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>European Commission</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Platform Governance</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Platform Regulation</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Social Media</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Social Media Ban</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>TikTok</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>TikTok</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Digitale-Dienste-Gesetz</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>TikTok</dc:subject>
        <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
        <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
        <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
        <dc:description>The European Commission's preliminary finding on TikTok’s addictive design from last month might be a game-changer for protecting users’ digital well-being under EU law. The Commission’s focus moves beyond illegal content on the platform to the design of the platform itself. For the DSA to make this enforceable, “digital well-being” needs to be operationalised in a way that regulators and platforms can actually measure and mitigate. This blog post begins with the Commission's findings to advance the first steps toward a theory of digital well-being within the EU platform regulation framework.</dc:description>
      </dc>
    </metadata>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
