<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-05-17T12:53:34Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:verfassungsblog.de/31307" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://verfassungsblog.de/oai/repository/</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <header>
      <identifier>oai:verfassungsblog.de/31307</identifier>
      <datestamp>2017-06-29T20:21:02Z</datestamp>
      <setSpec>posts</setSpec>
    </header>
    <metadata>
      <dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
        <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20170628-170808</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/normality-and-exception-the-advocate-generals-opinion-in-a-s-and-jafari/</dc:identifier>
        <dc:title>Normality and Exception: The Advocate General’s Opinion in A.S. and Jafari</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Salomon, Stefan</dc:creator>
        <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
        <dc:date>2017-06-28</dc:date>
        <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Dublin III</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Geneva Refugee Convention</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Refugee Protection</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>refugees</dc:subject>
        <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
        <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
        <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
        <dc:description>On 8 June 2017, Advocate General Eleanor Sharpston delivered her Opinion in a case that goes to the core of what (infamously) came to be known as ‘refugee crisis’. On a broader, more systemic, level, the Opinion could be read as a history of the present bringing to the fore issues of geographical hierarchies and injustice and solidarity inscribed into the structure of EU law.</dc:description>
      </dc>
    </metadata>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
